This CEF Is Tapping Private Credit Worries For 6.4% Payouts

I’m sure you’ve heard about the worries around private credit. They really hit the wall when Blue Owl Capital, a major private lender, put redemption limits on one of its funds earlier this year. As investors, we must take note when such things happen. But we also need to remember that breathless media coverage of such events creates opportunities. That’s especially true in situations like this, involving a corner of the financial world many people simply don’t understand. These are just the kind of setups we love to exploit at my CEF Insider service. And this one is handing us an opportunity in regional banks —and in particular, a closed-end fund (CEF) holding such banks, and turning their profits into a growing 6.4% dividend.

How We’re Playing Private Credit Fears For Outsized Dividends

I’m talking about the John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) , a CEF Insider holding that’s returned 14.7% since we bought it in our January 2026 issue. We bought BTO for many reasons, including the fact that its underlying portfolio (referred to as its net asset value, or NAV) has outrun the go-to S&P 500 index fund—the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) —over the last three years.

Notably, this period included the private-credit panic earlier this year, during which BTO still mostly led the S&P 500. But here’s the thing: On a market-price basis (yes, CEFs’ portfolios can, and often do, trade independently of their price on the open market), the fund is not reflecting this fact.

Even though its market price–based underperformance is slight, it has affected the fund’s valuation, which has slipped to a discount that’s getting wider. A discount is rare for this fund, which has carried a premium for much of the last decade.

BTO (and CEFs in general) are often attractive when they trade at unusual discounts like this. But when one appears, we do need to make sure we understand why it exists, and whether it indicates a bargain or a fund that’s “cheap for a reason.”

BTO Holdings

As you can see above, BTO’s portfolio is focused on regional banks. Top positions Old National Bancorp (ONB) , Citizens Financial Group (CFG) , M&T Bank (MTB) and WSFS Financial (WSFS) are smaller players with deep ties to their communities. ONB, CFG, MTB and WSFS have also been good at capitalizing on a trend that lets them outsource their risk. BTO’s management has noticed this, and has focused on the regional banks playing this trend well.

This trend has been underway since the 1970s and has picked up over the last 30 years. It circles around the fact that, over that time, lending by banks has played a smaller part in the overall economy:

In the old days, a business owner or manager would go to their local bank and ask for a loan. While it still works this way for smaller businesses, larger firms often go a different route. This is where two classes of other lenders come in—business development companies (BDCs) and, yes, private-credit funds. Over the years, these firms have set themselves up as “middlemen” between banks and borrowers. I want to focus on the latter sector that, yes, has been the focus of recent concerns. Here’s the problem with a blanket concern like that, though: As is the case with all companies, some private-credit firms...