Kaplan Fox Reminds Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) Investors with Significant Losses to Seek a Leadership Role Before Deadline on November 10, 2026

Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Lincoln Educational Services Corporation ("Lincoln Educational" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: LINC) on behalf of investors that purchased or otherwise acquired Lincoln Educational securities between May 11, 2026 and August 9, 2026 (the "Class Period").

If you are an investor in Lincoln Educational and have suffered losses, you may CLICK HERE to contact us. You may also contact Kaplan Fox by emailing [email protected] or by calling (646) 315-9003. DEADLINE REMINDER : If you are a member of the proposed Class, you may move the court no later than November 10, 2026 to serve as a lead plaintiff for the purported class. If you have losses we encourage you to contact us to learn more about the lead plaintiff process. You need not seek to become a lead plaintiff in order to share in any possible recovery.

According to the complaint, "[o]n August 10, 2026, before the market opened, Lincoln reported earnings for the second quarter of 2026." "[T]he Company reported student starts increased by only 1% year over year despite enrollment growing 9%, 'as fewer enrolled students than expected attended the first day of class.'" According to the complaint, the Company further disclosed that "during the quarter, we observed changes in the student decision-making process that affected conversion from enrollment to start" and that Lincoln "ha[s] taken, and [will] continue to take, actions to address these trends . . . ."

On August 10, 2026, the price of Lincoln Educational stock fell $10.22 per share, or 24.93%, to close at $30.77 per share.

The complaint alleges, among other things, that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose "(1) that the Company's admissions process was not effectively converting students from enrollment to start; (2) that, as a result, the Company was experiencing a significant drop in student starts relative to enrollment; and (3) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis."