
‘Wake-up call': Labor considers changing Australian laws after OpenAI Medicare hack
The Guardian
公開日時: Sep 25, 2026, 02:19 PM GMT+9
Sentiment Analysis
The federal government could change Australian laws if the current legal framework could not respond to the unprecedented OpenAI hack of Medicare, ministers have confirmed. It comes as the prime minister denied accusations from the opposition he had held onto the information before announcing it at the UN general assembly in New York, and said it was released at the first possible opportunity. “It’s just nonsense … I was informed while I’ve been in New York,” Anthony Albanese told News24 on Friday. “Imagine if we had said there’s been a data breach, but we don’t know what has been sourced, we don’t know if your personal information is out there, that would have created a great deal of anxiety, which was unnecessary. “We had to ascertain the facts, and then we made the statements, as a matter of urgency, we also provided briefings to the opposition, as is appropriate.” Katy Gallagher, the government services minister, said she was informed about the breach on 17 September. Guardian Australia understands she informed the prime minister between Friday 18 and Saturday 19 September. Albanese left for the United States on the Friday, where he first met with Apple’s executive chairman Tim Cook in California on Saturday morning, before flying to New York that afternoon. On Friday, the government said the review by spy agency, the Australian signals directorate, would consider whether legislative change was needed after the prime minister revealed an artificial intelligence agent developed by OpenAI hacked Medicare’s statistics website and three other systems in June. If current laws could not touch the tech giant, they would need updating, environment minister Murray Watt said on Friday. “There’s now a review of this underway through that task force that we’ve appointed, and one of the things that they’ll be looking at is whether these matters can be referred to the Australian federal police under current Australian law,” he told Channel Seven’s Sunrise program. “If that is possible to happen, then that will happen. If it’s not possible, then clearly that indicates that we need to change Australian laws, and that's what we'll be doing.” The assistant minister for technology and the digital economy, Andrew Charlton, acknowledged similar incidents would become “more and more prevalent into the future” and the government would need to be prepared. “That’s why we're conducting a review of the incident as well as a review of the laws to determine exactly … whether there needs to be legislative change to recognise this type of incident conducted by an AI agent rather than directly by a person or a company,” Charlton told ABC radio. Anthony Albanese told the Asia Society on Thursday that the incident was a “wake-up call” about the risks of AI, and whether humans would remain in charge of the technology. “This technology is moving very, very fast, and we need to make sure that we have a responsibility to keep on top of it,” Albanese said. Labor has announced it would legislate an AI standard, which Charlton said would be informed by the rapid review. The government has said it wants the bill to be introduced by the end of the year. UNSW professor Lyria Bennett Moses, an academic expert in technology and law, said Australia’s criminal laws should be clarified to determine how fault, such as intention or knowledge, is applied to a corporation when its AI agent commits ...
Source: The Guardian
個別の投資に関する推奨やアドバイスを提供することを意図しておりません。ここで述べられている意見や見解は、あくまでも各記事の個人的見解です。