PRCT FINAL DEADLINE: ROSEN, RECOGNIZED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - PRCT

According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants throughout the Class Period made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) during the Class Period, Procept had utilized an extensive discount program designed to incentivize its customers to place bulk orders in excess of procedure demand; (2) Procept's undisclosed discount program had artificially and unsustainably inflated Procept's reported U.S. handpiece unit sales and revenues by pulling forward sales at the expense of future periods; (3) Procept's undisclosed discount program had caused customer handpiece orders to materially exceed underlying procedure demand throughout the Class Period and that this differential had materially grown over time; (4) Procept's consistent surplus of U.S. handpiece unit sales relative to performed procedures had created a glut of field inventory and overstocking amongst Procept's customer base, amounting to more than 10,000 excess units by the end of the Class Period; (5) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' representations during the Class Period regarding Procept's handpiece unit sales and the utilization of Procept's field Systems were materially overstated; and (6) as a result of the foregoing, Procept was acutely exposed to material undisclosed risks of significant operational and financial harm; and (7) as a result of the foregoing, Procept was unable to achieve its stated 2025 handpiece sales and revenue guidance and such guidance lacked a reasonably achievable factual basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.